Less is More?!?!


Put that down! You don’t want to overdose on that glass of water, do you? Some substance might have left its imprint into the liquid’s memory, creating a potent drug…

Sound far-fetched? The British Parliament thinks so, which is why members of the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee have recently condemned funding for homeopathic drugs.

Homeopathy is a medical system that operates based on the principle that the lower the dose of medication, the greater its effectiveness. By diluting a substance many times, the end product has only the “essence” of the substance but none of the active ingredients.

The scientific community has continuously criticized homeopathic drugs for marketing a placebo effect and delaying diagnosis for individuals with underlying diseases. For these reasons and the financial burden of £4m a year, members of the parliament have proposed a bar on the licensing of homeopathic remedies, a step towards evidence-based medicine.

But one should pause before feeling content with the current situation, because homeopathy is still common in the United States. According to the 2007 National Health Interview Survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control, an estimated 3.9 million U.S. adults and approximately 900,000 children used homeopathy in the previous year. (More facts about the use of homeopathy and US policies can be found on the National Institutes of Health site here.)

From these frightening figures, it is clear that many people are still uninformed about the truth behind homeopathy, and that something needs to be done. No matter how scientifically advanced a country is, if the facts about topics like homeopathy are not effectively communicated, its citizens will still be hurt.

So is less really more? The answer turns out to be yes: less homeopathic drugs will be more beneficial to the wellness of individuals, but this can only be achieved if science is communicated effectively to society.

- blog authored by Kevin Li




While we must always keep any medical claims factual, and it is right that these issues are exposed to prevent harm, the classic case being homeopathy to treat malaria caused a lot of deaths.

We should not dismiss the benefits of alternative practices in maintaining a positive frame of mind which can not only to help the healing process but in some cases may be the cure.

All doctors will agree with this as being essential to combat such things as cancer, however, it is scientifically difficult to prove.

We need to do away with the term alternative medicine and leave medicine to the medical professionals. We should call it complementary therapy because that is what it does, it complements medical treatment but does not replace it.

I am a qualified colour therapist which is a recognised form of alternative medicine, when i am ill i see a doctor and would advise others to do the same. However, having done that i use what i know to assist in the healing process, reduce my need for medication, and stay healthy.

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <div> <br> <sup> <sub>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.